New members: Get your first 7 days of ITTutorPro Premium for free! Join for free No credit card required.
New members: Get your first 7 days of ITTutorPro Premium for free! Join for free No credit card required.
Closed Caption
Gain knowledge in the specific security discipline of computer forensics from a vendor-neutral perspective. This course will fortify the application knowledge of law enforcement personnel, system administrators, security officers, defense and military personnel, legal professionals, bankers, security professionals, and anyone who is concerned about the integrity of the network infrastructure.
The “Ethical Hacking” and “Forensic Investigator in Computer Hacking” course(s) are unofficial programs that have been developed by ITU independently of the EC-Council. EC-Council has not endorsed, sponsored or certified this material at any time whatsoever. Usage of these materials/books does not provide any guarantee of passing the EC-Council exam.
In the ever-evolving landscape of cyber threats, computer hacking incidents have become more frequent and sophisticated than ever before. To combat these cybercrimes and bring the culprits to justice, the role of a Forensic Investigator is paramount.
A Forensic Investigator in computer hacking, often referred to as a Digital Forensics Analyst, is a highly skilled professional responsible for collecting, preserving, and analyzing digital evidence related to cyberattacks and data breaches. Their expertise lies in uncovering the who, what, when, where, and how of a hacking incident.
Forensic Investigators play a pivotal role in the fight against cybercrime. Their work not only helps identify the perpetrators but also aids in improving cybersecurity measures to prevent future attacks. By unraveling the complexities of computer hacking incidents, they contribute to the overall security of organizations and individuals in an increasingly digital world.
In conclusion, a Forensic Investigator in computer hacking is a dedicated professional who serves as a beacon of justice in the realm of cybersecurity. Their expertise and commitment are essential in holding cybercriminals accountable and safeguarding the digital landscape for everyone.
Share on:
You Will Get Certification After Completion of This Course.
Instructional methods, course requirements, and learning technologies can vary significantly from one online program to the next, but the vast bulk of them use a learning management system (LMS) to deliver lectures and materials, monitor student progress, assess comprehension, and accept student work. LMS providers design these platforms to accommodate a multitude of instructor needs and preferences.
Online education may seem relatively new, but years of research suggests it can be just as effective as traditional coursework, and often more so. According to a U.S. Department of Education analysis of more than 1,000 learning studies, online students tend to outperform classroom-based students across most disciplines and demographics. Another major review published the same year found that online students had the advantage 70 percent of the time, a gap authors projected would only widen as programs and technologies evolve.
All new learning innovations are met with some degree of scrutiny, but skepticism subsides as methods become more mainstream. Such is the case for online learning. Studies indicate employers who are familiar with online degrees tend to view them more favorably, and more employers are acquainted with them than ever before. The majority of colleges now offer online degrees, including most public, not-for-profit, and Ivy League universities. Online learning is also increasingly prevalent in the workplace as more companies invest in web-based employee training and development programs.
The concern that online students cheat more than traditional students is perhaps misplaced. When researchers at Marshall University conducted a study to measure the prevalence of cheating in online and classroom-based courses, they concluded, “Somewhat surprisingly, the results showed higher rates of academic dishonesty in live courses.” The authors suggest the social familiarity of students in a classroom setting may lessen their sense of moral obligation.
